Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

As a professional scientist who likes to chat at parties, my typical cocktail-party conversation goes something like this: Me: "Hi X. Nice to meet you." X: "Likewise. So what do you do?" Me: "I'm a nuclear physicist." X: "..." Me: "Seriously." X: "Wow. I've never met a nuclear physicist before. What do you do?" Me: "I smash atoms" X: "Wow. But what's it for? Does it have any relevance to the real world?" Relevance - among this group of Quantum Diarists, I'm sure we all want it. In some sense, most of us live with the guilt of feeling passionate about a field of study that doesn't directly affect the daily life of the average person. Sure "we" invented the web (although the truth is that it was invented for us by a real software engineer). And obviously nuclear physics had it's day in the sun, as it were, during the Manhattan Project and the Cold War, when "we" (actually it was the military) released the specter of nuclear weapons and power on the unsuspecting world. That's relevance all right, but that was a time when it was a stark choice between playing with fire and risking an Axis victory. The modern world is certainly not lacking for weapons technologies. Nor do the pressing issues of the day (e.g. national security, disease, climate change) appear to have an obvious solution which will rely on a new insight about a new fundamental force lead loan mortgage sales you typically need only a single old one to understand most of biology and chemistry).

Jerry Brown, who's running for California Attorney General, is probably the only Democrat I'll be voting for on Tuesday. A concerned Christian man had some words for Californians who are planning to vote for the zen fascist in the glorious and enlightening letter section of the OC Reg : One of the worst personal characteristics is hypocrisy. Enter Jerry Brown, who fights for the right to choose and at the same time declares that he is a Roman Catholic, whose church, along with our Baptist brothers and sisters, especially, and other Christian faiths, decries such a choice. That makes him a hypocrite. Please vote your conscience, Christians, and don't vote for this man . He hasn't changed his image since he was our governor, when he was labeled correctly as Gov. Moonbeam. Just ask all those Catholics engaging in pre-marital sex (a mortal sin) and practicing birth control (could be mortal but is probably venial) how many church teachings they violate every week. Hell must have a lot of room for these future guests. See, I would consider hypocrisy taking marching orders from a homophobic evangelical pastor who queen size bedding pends time away from his family banging male prostitutes . Or how about blindly supporting the war on IraqiIranSyraAbsurdistan while ignoring your church's teachings on "just war"? Oh yeah, my bad, Jesus always loved a good ass kicking and he was totally cool with his apostles molesting little children.

Amanda Prince is the girlfriend of NASCAR Nextel Cup driver Elliott Sadler . The new couple has been dating for just a few months, but both are Emporia, Va. natives and their families have known each other for many years. Amanda plays in a recreational softball league on the Sadler family team, along with Elliott's sister, Marion, and his sister-in-law, Angela. Several months ago, while Elliott was in his hometown taking in a game, the two became reacquainted. There was no denying the chemistry between them and they started hanging out together immediately. Elliott is smitten and admits that prior to meeting Amanda, his personal life had been on the back burner. Quoting this... Elliott: "Racing is still No. 1 to me and it's still very important, but now I have someone to share that with... She's just an amazing person. I'm not the most optimistic person in the world -- the glass has always been half-empty for me -- but for some reason it's half-full right now and I have her to thank for that. Things have been on an upswing and things have been a lot of fun. In fact, I didn't think life could be this much fun and man, it's been a blast." [ NASCAR.com , Feb. 20, 2007] Since August of 2005, Amanda has been a 4th grade elementary school teacher. Additionally, she teaches Water Aerobics for the YMCA and taught Elliott's nieces how to swim. She is also active in the Emporia Junior Woman's Club. get paid to read emails nd according to Elliott, she is a great mom to his 30+ hunting dogs.

Now I know I've got to be ill with some exotic virus I've never been exposed to before. Whatever kind of weird bug it is, it is a potent one because ever since I opened that email from Mantis advertising this shed here on the right, building it is all I can think about for the moment. Mantis is offering this KIT for $89.95 and shipping is free but the offer is only good until January 27, 2007. I don't know what happens to it then. Maybe it changes into a pumpkin or something even more weird. The shed can be built in one of three sizes 7 x 8 8 x 14 or 8 x 22 And the ad says: Build a sturdy, long-lasting shed using your lumber at a medical emergency raction of the cost of typical sheds! Unique angle brackets make building the shed kit safe and simple. Requires only 90 degree cuts….no angles! Kit includes galvanized steel brackets, plans for 7’x8’, 8’x14’ and 10’x22’ shed, a cut list and materials list. Just add 2x4's to construct a complete shed. What one gets for their $89.95 is a bunch of galvanized steel angle brackets and the plans for constructing either of the shed sizes and a cut list for all three (as best I can tell by this ad.) That deadline date doesn't allow me a lot of time to mull it over or talk to the money person I MUST consult before making a major investment of any kind. I recall last year when I was trying to decide what to do in the back yard...build a wood deck, build a man-made wood substitute deck or go the concrete pad route.

Now I know I've got to be ill with some exotic virus I've never been exposed to before. Whatever kind of weird bug it is, it is a potent one because ever since I opened that email from Mantis advertising this shed here on the right, building it is all I can think about for the moment. Mantis is offering this KIT for $89.95 and shipping is free but the offer is only good until January 27, 2007. I don't know what happens to it then. Maybe it changes into a pumpkin or something even more weird. The shed can be built in one of three sizes 7 x 8 8 x 14 or 8 x 22 And the ad says: Build a sturdy, long-lasting shed using your lumber at a fraction of the cost of typical sheds! Unique angle brackets make building the shed kit safe and simple. Requires only 90 degree cuts….no angles! Kit includes galvanized canadian fly fishing teel brackets, plans for 7’x8’, 8’x14’ and 10’x22’ shed, a cut list and materials list. Just add 2x4's to construct a complete shed. What one gets for their $89.95 is a bunch of galvanized steel angle brackets and the plans for constructing either of the shed sizes and a cut list for all three (as best I can tell by this ad.) That deadline date doesn't allow me a lot of time to mull it over or talk to the money person I MUST consult before making a major investment of any kind. I recall last year when I was trying to decide what to do in the back yard...build a wood deck, build a man-made wood substitute deck or go the concrete pad route.

Amanda Prince is the girlfriend of NASCAR Nextel Cup driver Elliott Sadler . The new couple has been dating for just a few months, but both are Emporia, Va. natives and their families have known each other for many years. Amanda plays in a recreational softball league on the Sadler family team, along with Elliott's sister, Marion, and his sister-in-law, Angela. Several months ago, while Elliott was in his hometown taking in a game, the two became reacquainted. There was no denying the chemistry between them and they started hanging out together immediately. Elliott is smitten and admits that prior to meeting Amanda, his personal life had been on the back burner. Quoting this... Elliott: "Racing is still No. 1 to me and it's still very important, but now I have someone to share that with... She's just an amazing person. I'm not the most optimistic person in the world -- the glass has always been half-empty for me -- but for some reason it's half-full right now and I have her to thank for that. Things have been on an upswing and things have been a lot of fun. In fact, I didn't think life could be this much fun and man, it's been lead loan mortgage sales blast." [ NASCAR.com , Feb. 20, 2007] Since August of 2005, Amanda has been a 4th grade elementary school teacher. Additionally, she teaches Water Aerobics for the YMCA and taught Elliott's nieces how to swim. She is also active in the Emporia Junior Woman's Club. And according to Elliott, she is a great mom to his 30+ hunting dogs.

Amanda Prince is the girlfriend of NASCAR Nextel Cup driver Elliott Sadler . The new couple has been dating for just a few months, but both are Emporia, Va. natives and their families have known each other for many years. Amanda plays in a recreational softball league on the Sadler family team, along with Elliott's sister, Marion, and his sister-in-law, Angela. Several months ago, while Elliott was in his hometown taking in a game, the two became reacquainted. There was no denying the chemistry between them and they started hanging out together immediately. Elliott is smitten and admits that prior to meeting Amanda, his personal life had been on the back burner. Quoting this... Elliott: "Racing is still No. 1 to me and it's still very important, but now I have someone to share that with... She's just an amazing person. I'm not the most optimistic person in the world -- the glass has always been half-empty for me -- queen size ut for some reason it's half-full right now and I have her to thank for that. Things have been on an upswing and things have been a lot of fun. In fact, I didn't think life could be this much fun and man, it's been a blast." [ NASCAR.com , Feb. 20, 2007] Since August of 2005, Amanda has been a 4th grade elementary school teacher. Additionally, she teaches Water Aerobics for the YMCA and taught Elliott's nieces how to swim. She is also active in the Emporia Junior Woman's Club. And according to Elliott, she is a great mom to his 30+ hunting dogs.

As a professional scientist who likes to chat at parties, my typical cocktail-party conversation goes something like this: Me: "Hi X. Nice to meet you." X: "Likewise. So what do you do?" Me: "I'm a nuclear physicist." X: "..." Me: "Seriously." X: "Wow. I've never met a nuclear physicist before. What do you do?" Me: "I smash atoms" X: "Wow. But what's it for? Does it have any relevance to the real world?" Relevance - among this group of Quantum Diarists, I'm sure we all want it. In some sense, most of us live with the guilt of feeling passionate about a field of study that doesn't directly affect the daily life of the average person. Sure "we" invented the web (although the truth is that it was invented for us by a real software engineer). And obviously nuclear physics had it's day in the sun, as it were, during the Manhattan Project and the Cold War, when "we" (actually it was the military) released the specter of nuclear weapons and power on the unsuspecting world. That's relevance all right, but that was a time when it was a stark choice between playing with fire and risking an Axis victory. The modern world is certainly not lacking for weapons technologies. Nor do the pressing issues of the day (e.g. national security, disease, climate change) appear to have an obvious solution which will rely on a new insight about a new fundamental force get paid to read emails you typically need only a single old one to understand most of biology and chemistry).

As a professional scientist who likes to chat at parties, my typical cocktail-party conversation goes something like this: Me: "Hi X. Nice to meet you." X: "Likewise. So what do you do?" Me: "I'm a nuclear physicist." X: "..." Me: "Seriously." X: "Wow. I've never met a nuclear physicist before. What do you do?" Me: "I smash atoms" X: "Wow. But what's it for? Does it have any relevance to the real world?" Relevance - among this group of Quantum Diarists, I'm sure we all want it. In some sense, most of us live with the guilt of feeling passionate about a field of study that doesn't directly affect the daily life of the average person. Sure "we" invented the web (although the truth is that it was invented for us by a real software engineer). And obviously nuclear physics had it's day in the sun, as it were, during the Manhattan Project and the Cold War, when "we" (actually it was the military) released the specter of nuclear weapons and power on the unsuspecting world. That's relevance all right, but that was a time when it was a stark choice between playing with fire and risking an Axis victory. The modern world is certainly not lacking for weapons technologies. Nor do the pressing issues of the day (e.g. national security, disease, climate change) appear to have an obvious solution which will rely on a new insight about a new fundamental force (you typically need only a single old one to understand most of medical emergency iology and chemistry).

probable british columbia fly fishing

Now I know I've got to be ill with some exotic virus I've never been exposed to before. Whatever kind of weird bug it is, it is a potent one because ever since I opened that email from Mantis advertising this shed here on the right, building it is all I can think about for the moment. Mantis is offering this KIT for $89.95 and shipping is free but the offer is only good until January 27, 2007. I don't know what happens to it then. Maybe it changes lead loan mortgage sales nto a pumpkin or something even more weird. The shed can be built in one of three sizes 7 x 8 8 x 14 or 8 x 22 And the ad says: Build a sturdy, long-lasting shed using your lumber at a fraction of the cost of typical sheds! Unique angle brackets make building the shed kit safe and simple. Requires only 90 degree cuts….no angles! Kit includes galvanized steel brackets, plans for 7’x8’, 8’x14’ and 10’x22’ shed, a cut list and materials list. Just add 2x4's to construct a complete shed. What one gets for their $89.95 is a bunch of galvanized steel angle brackets and the plans for constructing either of the shed sizes and a cut list for all three (as best I can tell by this ad.) That deadline date doesn't allow me a lot of time to mull it over or talk to the money person I MUST consult before making a major investment of any kind. I recall last year when I was trying to decide what to do in the back yard...build a wood deck, build a man-made wood substitute deck or go the concrete pad route.

One interesting queen size ikimania session by Seth Anthony presented some research on contribution patterns. My notes: Only 10% of edits are high content edits. 30% of those are anonymous, none are by admins, 52% are by someone with a userpage, none have a barnstar. The people who are creating content are relatively new, not versed in style guides and bureaucracy. Their use of Wikipedia speeds up a little bit through use, but not much. Admins, on the other hand, are relatively efficient in their edits and have a consistent pace. They only edit within the article namespace 60% of the time. In other words, most edits are revisions of vandalism. But in the early days they edited less frequently, created more content (76% of the time) and edited less consistently. Content creators seem to be occasional and less frequent editors that may be specialists (subject matter knowledge). Admins are former content creators, now janitors. One person in the audience volunteered that he just crossed over from subject expert to janitor to emphasize this point. In other words, the core community within the Power Law of Participation , the 500 people that do 50% of the edits, or 0.5% of the registered population -- does the heavy lifting for subject experts. Advances like Wikiwyg may increase the number and diversity of subject expert contributors. With 2 million edits per month and vandalism anecdotally scaling linearly with edits, janitors matter.

Now I know I've got to be ill with some exotic virus get paid to read email 've never been exposed to before. Whatever kind of weird bug it is, it is a potent one because ever since I opened that email from Mantis advertising this shed here on the right, building it is all I can think about for the moment. Mantis is offering this KIT for $89.95 and shipping is free but the offer is only good until January 27, 2007. I don't know what happens to it then. Maybe it changes into a pumpkin or something even more weird. The shed can be built in one of three sizes 7 x 8 8 x 14 or 8 x 22 And the ad says: Build a sturdy, long-lasting shed using your lumber at a fraction of the cost of typical sheds! Unique angle brackets make building the shed kit safe and simple. Requires only 90 degree cuts….no angles! Kit includes galvanized steel brackets, plans for 7’x8’, 8’x14’ and 10’x22’ shed, a cut list and materials list. Just add 2x4's to construct a complete shed. What one gets for their $89.95 is a bunch of galvanized steel angle brackets and the plans for constructing either of the shed sizes and a cut list for all three (as best I can tell by this ad.) That deadline date doesn't allow me a lot of time to mull it over or talk to the money person I MUST consult before making a major investment of any kind. I recall last year when I was trying to decide what to do in the back yard...build a wood deck, build a man-made wood substitute deck or go the concrete pad route.

probable medical emergency

Jerry Brown, who's running for California Attorney General, is probably the only Democrat I'll be voting for on Tuesday. A concerned Christian man had some words for Californians who are planning to vote for the zen fascist in canadian fly fishing he glorious and enlightening letter section of the OC Reg : One of the worst personal characteristics is hypocrisy. Enter Jerry Brown, who fights for the right to choose and at the same time declares that he is a Roman Catholic, whose church, along with our Baptist brothers and sisters, especially, and other Christian faiths, decries such a choice. That makes him a hypocrite. Please vote your conscience, Christians, and don't vote for this man . He hasn't changed his image since he was our governor, when he was labeled correctly as Gov. Moonbeam. Just ask all those Catholics engaging in pre-marital sex (a mortal sin) and practicing birth control (could be mortal but is probably venial) how many church teachings they violate every week. Hell must have a lot of room for these future guests. See, I would consider hypocrisy taking marching orders from a homophobic evangelical pastor who spends time away from his family banging male prostitutes . Or how about blindly supporting the war on IraqiIranSyraAbsurdistan while ignoring your church's teachings on "just war"? Oh yeah, my bad, Jesus always loved a good ass kicking and he was totally cool with his apostles molesting little children.

One interesting Wikimania session by Seth Anthony presented some research on contribution patterns. My notes: Only 10% of edits are high content edits. 30% of those are anonymous, none are by admins, 52% are by someone with a lead loan mortgage sales serpage, none have a barnstar. The people who are creating content are relatively new, not versed in style guides and bureaucracy. Their use of Wikipedia speeds up a little bit through use, but not much. Admins, on the other hand, are relatively efficient in their edits and have a consistent pace. They only edit within the article namespace 60% of the time. In other words, most edits are revisions of vandalism. But in the early days they edited less frequently, created more content (76% of the time) and edited less consistently. Content creators seem to be occasional and less frequent editors that may be specialists (subject matter knowledge). Admins are former content creators, now janitors. One person in the audience volunteered that he just crossed over from subject expert to janitor to emphasize this point. In other words, the core community within the Power Law of Participation , the 500 people that do 50% of the edits, or 0.5% of the registered population -- does the heavy lifting for subject experts. Advances like Wikiwyg may increase the number and diversity of subject expert contributors. With 2 million edits per month and vandalism anecdotally scaling linearly with edits, janitors matter.

Jerry Brown, who's running for California Attorney General, is probably the only Democrat I'll be voting for on Tuesday. A concerned Christian man had some words for Californians who are planning to vote for the zen fascist in the glorious and enlightening letter section of the OC Reg : One of the worst personal characteristics is hypocrisy. Enter Jerry Brown, who fights for the right to choose and at the same time declares that he is a Roman Catholic, whose church, along with our Baptist brothers and sisters, especially, and other Christian faiths, decries such a choice. That makes him a hypocrite. Please vote your conscience, Christians, and don't vote for this man . He hasn't changed his image since he was our governor, when he was labeled correctly queen size s Gov. Moonbeam. Just ask all those Catholics engaging in pre-marital sex (a mortal sin) and practicing birth control (could be mortal but is probably venial) how many church teachings they violate every week. Hell must have a lot of room for these future guests. See, I would consider hypocrisy taking marching orders from a homophobic evangelical pastor who spends time away from his family banging male prostitutes . Or how about blindly supporting the war on IraqiIranSyraAbsurdistan while ignoring your church's teachings on "just war"? Oh yeah, my bad, Jesus always loved a good ass kicking and he was totally cool with his apostles molesting little children.

Jerry Brown, who's running for California Attorney General, is probably the only Democrat I'll be voting for on Tuesday. A concerned Christian man had some words for Californians who are planning to vote for the zen fascist in the glorious and enlightening letter section of the OC Reg : One of the worst personal characteristics is hypocrisy. Enter Jerry Brown, who fights for the right to choose medical emergency nd at the same time declares that he is a Roman Catholic, whose church, along with our Baptist brothers and sisters, especially, and other Christian faiths, decries such a choice. That makes him a hypocrite. Please vote your conscience, Christians, and don't vote for this man . He hasn't changed his image since he was our governor, when he was labeled correctly as Gov. Moonbeam. Just ask all those Catholics engaging in pre-marital sex (a mortal sin) and practicing birth control (could be mortal but is probably venial) how many church teachings they violate every week. Hell must have a lot of room for these future guests. See, I would consider hypocrisy taking marching orders from a homophobic evangelical pastor who spends time away from his family banging male prostitutes . Or how about blindly supporting the war on IraqiIranSyraAbsurdistan while ignoring your church's teachings on "just war"? Oh yeah, my bad, Jesus always loved a good ass kicking and he was totally cool with his apostles molesting little children.

probable canadian fly fishing

Now I know I've got to be ill life insurance lead ith some exotic virus I've never been exposed to before. Whatever kind of weird bug it is, it is a potent one because ever since I opened that email from Mantis advertising this shed here on the right, building it is all I can think about for the moment. Mantis is offering this KIT for $89.95 and shipping is free but the offer is only good until January 27, 2007. I don't know what happens to it then. Maybe it changes into a pumpkin or something even more weird. The shed can be built in one of three sizes 7 x 8 8 x 14 or 8 x 22 And the ad says: Build a sturdy, long-lasting shed using your lumber at a fraction of the cost of typical sheds! Unique angle brackets make building the shed kit safe and simple. Requires only 90 degree cuts….no angles! Kit includes galvanized steel brackets, plans for 7’x8’, 8’x14’ and 10’x22’ shed, a cut list and materials list. Just add 2x4's to construct a complete shed. What one gets for their $89.95 is a bunch of galvanized steel angle brackets and the plans for constructing either of the shed sizes and a cut list for all three (as best I can tell by this ad.) That deadline date doesn't allow me a lot of time to mull it over or talk to the money person I MUST consult before making a major investment of any kind. I recall last year when I was trying to decide what to do in the back yard...build a wood deck, build a man-made wood substitute deck or go the concrete pad route.

As a professional scientist who likes to chat at parties, my typical cocktail-party conversation goes something like this: Me: "Hi X. Nice to meet you." X: "Likewise. So what do you do?" Me: "I'm a nuclear physicist." X: "..." Me: "Seriously." X: "Wow. I've never met a nuclear physicist before. What do you do?" Me: "I smash atoms" X: "Wow. But what's it for? Does it have any relevance to the real world?" Relevance - among this group of Quantum Diarists, I'm sure we all want it. In some sense, most of us live with the guilt of feeling passionate about a field of study that doesn't directly affect the daily life of the average person. Sure "we" invented the web (although the truth is that it was invented for us by a real software engineer). And obviously nuclear physics had it's day in the sun, as it were, during the Manhattan Project and the Cold War, when "we" (actually it was the military) released the specter of nuclear weapons and power on the unsuspecting world. That's relevance all right, but that was a time when it was a stark choice between playing with fire and risking an Axis victory. The modern world is certainly not lacking for weapons technologies. Nor do the pressing queen size ssues of the day (e.g. national security, disease, climate change) appear to have an obvious solution which will rely on a new insight about a new fundamental force (you typically need only a single old one to understand most of biology and chemistry).

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Reader Rachel brought this small business advice rticle to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

danger website affiliate

Aleks pointed to an interesting Business Week chart used to monkey cage xplain what people in different age groups are doing on-line. This is a pretty chart that does an admirable job with a difficult data set. The key to this chart, unfortunately missing, is that the percentages must be read as vertical columns to make sense. So the top left square says 34% of "Young Teens" who answered the survey said they create web pages on-line. In addition, the total of each column can be much more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed. Realizing the above, we should interpret the bottom (grey) row as saying: "Older boomers" and "seniors" are more likely to be "Inactives" than younger people . A tempting interpretation is: "Inactives" are more likely to be "seniors" and "older boomers". But this is wrong because the chart hides the age distribution. While 70% of "Seniors" are inactive, "Seniors" may represent a small proportion of the population, and thus they may not account for a large proportion of "Inactives". This is the difference between prevalence and incidence rate. (Another way to grasp this is to add the percentages across a row and try and fail to understand what the row sum could mean.) The construct of the square grids is less damaging than it seems. In effect, the data has been rescaled by dividing by 10. The reader is then forced to apply "rounding". If you are someone who sees $19.95 as $19, then you'd round down the partial rows. If you see $19.

danger credit identity theft

Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting the 3 hour diet imes: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum discover card application hat the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

Yesterday my sister added her list of Things That Unnerve her to comments on my recent post regarding same . (You'll have to scroll down for her list, authored by "lxz"). I had forgotten about her lifelong psychological battle with metal hangers, and I found her comments pretty funny. But inaccurate. Well, at least the last paragraph, in which she accuses me of punching her in the nose because I wanted to hear "I Shot the Sheriff" on the radio. She writes: Lastly, I must dispute your claim that you dislike "I shot the Sheriff". I do recall an incident when fun party e were hangin' out in the 'Ol 71 Dodge Dart Swinger on a blustery and dismal saturday morning,('member that beauty with the battleship grey paint, the black vinyl roof, bucket seats and an aftermarket air condidtioning unit) waitin' for dad to finish up at the Commissary and you got mad when I hit the button to change the station because I hated the song and you flipped it back to listen to it and I switched it again and then you socked me in the nose, causing it to bleed in the backseat and all over me and the car. Dad came back and asked what happenend and you said that I kept flipping the station when your fav song was on. I think I ended up getting in trouble because you said I started it and I wasn't clever enough to argue the point like you do. Actually, I probably couldn't defend myself aptly because I was choking on blood.

danger euro pro steam generator iron

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with chat for kids lobal warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.

danger health insurance leads

Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? legal child support re we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

Aleks pointed to an interesting Business Week chart used to explain what people in different age groups are doing on-line. This is a pretty chart that does an admirable job with a difficult data set. The key to this chart, unfortunately missing, is that the percentages must be read as vertical columns to make sense. So the top left square says 34% of "Young Teens" who answered the survey said they create web pages on-line. In addition, the total of each column can be much more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed. Realizing the above, we should interpret the bottom (grey) row as saying: "Older boomers" and "seniors" are more likely to be "Inactives" than younger people . A tempting interpretation is: "Inactives" are more likely to be "seniors" and "older boomers". But this is wrong because the chart hides the age distribution. While 70% uop student login f "Seniors" are inactive, "Seniors" may represent a small proportion of the population, and thus they may not account for a large proportion of "Inactives". This is the difference between prevalence and incidence rate. (Another way to grasp this is to add the percentages across a row and try and fail to understand what the row sum could mean.) The construct of the square grids is less damaging than it seems. In effect, the data has been rescaled by dividing by 10. The reader is then forced to apply "rounding". If you are someone who sees $19.95 as $19, then you'd round down the partial rows. If you see $19.

Update: No one says it better than Olivier ! I get a kick out of people claiming that because they have "experience" they are qualified to offer consultation. Experience does not equate to "expertise" or "knowledge" and even those elements are subjective. "Experience" is when a person is encountering or undergoing something. "Expertise" is expert skill or knowledge in a particular area. Did you benefit from lessons learned? Let us explore the different forms of knowledge as provided by: ATHERTON J S (2003) Doceo: Forms Long Beach Resort Panama City Beach Fl f Knowledge [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/forms.htm Technical Knowledge vs. Practicle Knowledge (Aristotle, Oakeshott) Knowing that vs. Knowing how (Ryle) Propositional knowledge vs. Procedural knowledge (Conscious knowledge) vs. Tacit knowledge (Polanyi) Comprehension (knowledge about) vs. Apprehension (knowledge by direct acquaintance) (Kolb) "There are problems with all these constructs, and most knowledge in the real world is a combination of many forms, but the distinctions are far from sterile." Just because someone has been in the communications field for twenty years, does not make them an expert. Remember, we are striving to be "counselors" not pigeon-holed as "practitioners." What is the right thing to do...be it ethical or tactical? This is our drive. Age is no barrier, only the levels of which you expand your mind.

Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel online doctorate programs inger says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists how to register a business name in id announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming cell phone ringers nd increased levels of carbon dioxide.

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth california shared office as gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years river rafting trip ccording to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.

danger how to start a business

Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays website affiliate ut the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

danger circuit bending bent monkey cage

Click Here

danger low carb diet

danger american express card application

danger fun party

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What steam generator iron he article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.

danger yahoo java chat

Update: No one says it better than Olivier ! I get a kick out of people claiming that because they have "experience" they are qualified to offer consultation. Experience does not equate to "expertise" or "knowledge" and even those elements are subjective. "Experience" is when a person is encountering or undergoing something. "Expertise" is expert skill or knowledge in a particular area. Did you benefit from lessons learned? Let us explore the different forms of knowledge as provided by: ATHERTON J S (2003) Doceo: Forms of Knowledge [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/forms.htm Technical Knowledge vs. Practicle Knowledge (Aristotle, Oakeshott) Knowing that vs. Knowing live mortgage leads ow (Ryle) Propositional knowledge vs. Procedural knowledge (Conscious knowledge) vs. Tacit knowledge (Polanyi) Comprehension (knowledge about) vs. Apprehension (knowledge by direct acquaintance) (Kolb) "There are problems with all these constructs, and most knowledge in the real world is a combination of many forms, but the distinctions are far from sterile." Just because someone has been in the communications field for twenty years, does not make them an expert. Remember, we are striving to be "counselors" not pigeon-holed as "practitioners." What is the right thing to do...be it ethical or tactical? This is our drive. Age is no barrier, only the levels of which you expand your mind.

Click Here

danger uop student login

Yesterday my sister added her list of Things That Unnerve her to comments on my recent post regarding same . (You'll have to scroll down for her list, authored by "lxz"). I had forgotten about her lifelong psychological battle with metal hangers, and I found her comments pretty funny. But inaccurate. Well, at least the last paragraph, in which she accuses me of punching her in the nose because I wanted to hear "I Shot the Sheriff" on the radio. She writes: Lastly, I must dispute your claim that you dislike "I shot the Sheriff". I do recall an incident when we were hangin' out in the 'Ol 71 Dodge Dart Swinger on a blustery and dismal saturday morning,('member that beauty with the battleship grey paint, the black vinyl roof, bucket seats and an aftermarket air condidtioning unit) waitin' for dad to finish up at the Commissary and you got mad when I hit the button to change the station because I hated the song and you flipped it back to listen to it and I switched it again and then you socked me in the nose, causing it to bleed in the backseat and all over me and the car. Dad came back and asked what happenend and you said that I kept flipping the station when your fav song was on. I think I ended up getting in trouble because you said I started it and I wasn't clever enough to argue the point like you do. Actually, I probably couldn't defend myself aptly Long Beach Resort Panama City Beach Fl ecause I was choking on blood.

Yesterday my sister added her list of Things That Unnerve her to comments on my recent post regarding same . (You'll have to scroll down for her list, authored by "lxz"). I had forgotten about her lifelong psychological battle with metal hangers, and I found her comments pretty funny. But inaccurate. Well, at least the last paragraph, in which she accuses me of punching her in the nose because I wanted to hear "I Shot the Sheriff" on the radio. She writes: Lastly, I must dispute your claim that you dislike "I shot the Sheriff". I do recall an incident when we were hangin' out in the 'Ol 71 Dodge Dart Swinger on a blustery and dismal saturday morning,('member that beauty with the battleship grey paint, the black vinyl roof, bucket seats and an aftermarket air condidtioning unit) waitin' for dad to finish up at the Commissary and you got mad when I hit the button to change the online doctorate programs tation because I hated the song and you flipped it back to listen to it and I switched it again and then you socked me in the nose, causing it to bleed in the backseat and all over me and the car. Dad came back and asked what happenend and you said that I kept flipping the station when your fav song was on. I think I ended up getting in trouble because you said I started it and I wasn't clever enough to argue the point like you do. Actually, I probably couldn't defend myself aptly because I was choking on blood.

Update: No one says it better than Olivier ! I get a kick out of people claiming that because they have "experience" they are qualified how to register a business name o offer consultation. Experience does not equate to "expertise" or "knowledge" and even those elements are subjective. "Experience" is when a person is encountering or undergoing something. "Expertise" is expert skill or knowledge in a particular area. Did you benefit from lessons learned? Let us explore the different forms of knowledge as provided by: ATHERTON J S (2003) Doceo: Forms of Knowledge [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/forms.htm Technical Knowledge vs. Practicle Knowledge (Aristotle, Oakeshott) Knowing that vs. Knowing how (Ryle) Propositional knowledge vs. Procedural knowledge (Conscious knowledge) vs. Tacit knowledge (Polanyi) Comprehension (knowledge about) vs. Apprehension (knowledge by direct acquaintance) (Kolb) "There are problems with all these constructs, and most knowledge in the real world is a combination of many forms, but the distinctions are far from sterile." Just because someone has been in the communications field for twenty years, does not make them an expert. Remember, we are striving to be "counselors" not pigeon-holed as "practitioners." What is the right thing to do...be it ethical or tactical? This is our drive. Age is no barrier, only the levels of which you expand your mind.

Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah free sprint pcs ringers lah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...

I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of california ca gov an. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.

danger river rafting trips