Reader Rachel brought this
small business advice rticle to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...
danger
website affiliateAleks pointed to an interesting Business Week chart used to
monkey cage xplain what people in different age groups are doing on-line. This is a pretty chart that does an admirable job with a difficult data set. The key to this chart, unfortunately missing, is that the percentages must be read as vertical columns to make sense. So the top left square says 34% of "Young Teens" who answered the survey said they create web pages on-line. In addition, the total of each column can be much more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed. Realizing the above, we should interpret the bottom (grey) row as saying: "Older boomers" and "seniors" are more likely to be "Inactives" than younger people . A tempting interpretation is: "Inactives" are more likely to be "seniors" and "older boomers". But this is wrong because the chart hides the age distribution. While 70% of "Seniors" are inactive, "Seniors" may represent a small proportion of the population, and thus they may not account for a large proportion of "Inactives". This is the difference between prevalence and incidence rate. (Another way to grasp this is to add the percentages across a row and try and fail to understand what the row sum could mean.) The construct of the square grids is less damaging than it seems. In effect, the data has been rescaled by dividing by 10. The reader is then forced to apply "rounding". If you are someone who sees $19.95 as $19, then you'd round down the partial rows. If you see $19.
danger
credit identity theftReader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting
the 3 hour diet imes: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...
Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum
discover card application hat the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...
Yesterday my sister added her list of Things That Unnerve her to comments on my recent post regarding same . (You'll have to scroll down for her list, authored by "lxz"). I had forgotten about her lifelong psychological battle with metal hangers, and I found her comments pretty funny. But inaccurate. Well, at least the last paragraph, in which she accuses me of punching her in the nose because I wanted to hear "I Shot the Sheriff" on the radio. She writes: Lastly, I must dispute your claim that you dislike "I shot the Sheriff". I do recall an incident when
fun party e were hangin' out in the 'Ol 71 Dodge Dart Swinger on a blustery and dismal saturday morning,('member that beauty with the battleship grey paint, the black vinyl roof, bucket seats and an aftermarket air condidtioning unit) waitin' for dad to finish up at the Commissary and you got mad when I hit the button to change the station because I hated the song and you flipped it back to listen to it and I switched it again and then you socked me in the nose, causing it to bleed in the backseat and all over me and the car. Dad came back and asked what happenend and you said that I kept flipping the station when your fav song was on. I think I ended up getting in trouble because you said I started it and I wasn't clever enough to argue the point like you do. Actually, I probably couldn't defend myself aptly because I was choking on blood.
danger
euro pro steam generator ironI had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with
chat for kids lobal warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.
danger
health insurance leadsReader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true?
legal child support re we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel Singer says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...
Aleks pointed to an interesting Business Week chart used to explain what people in different age groups are doing on-line. This is a pretty chart that does an admirable job with a difficult data set. The key to this chart, unfortunately missing, is that the percentages must be read as vertical columns to make sense. So the top left square says 34% of "Young Teens" who answered the survey said they create web pages on-line. In addition, the total of each column can be much more than 100% because multiple responses were allowed. Realizing the above, we should interpret the bottom (grey) row as saying: "Older boomers" and "seniors" are more likely to be "Inactives" than younger people . A tempting interpretation is: "Inactives" are more likely to be "seniors" and "older boomers". But this is wrong because the chart hides the age distribution. While 70%
uop student login f "Seniors" are inactive, "Seniors" may represent a small proportion of the population, and thus they may not account for a large proportion of "Inactives". This is the difference between prevalence and incidence rate. (Another way to grasp this is to add the percentages across a row and try and fail to understand what the row sum could mean.) The construct of the square grids is less damaging than it seems. In effect, the data has been rescaled by dividing by 10. The reader is then forced to apply "rounding". If you are someone who sees $19.95 as $19, then you'd round down the partial rows. If you see $19.
Update: No one says it better than Olivier ! I get a kick out of people claiming that because they have "experience" they are qualified to offer consultation. Experience does not equate to "expertise" or "knowledge" and even those elements are subjective. "Experience" is when a person is encountering or undergoing something. "Expertise" is expert skill or knowledge in a particular area. Did you benefit from lessons learned? Let us explore the different forms of knowledge as provided by: ATHERTON J S (2003) Doceo: Forms
Long Beach Resort Panama City Beach Fl f Knowledge [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/forms.htm Technical Knowledge vs. Practicle Knowledge (Aristotle, Oakeshott) Knowing that vs. Knowing how (Ryle) Propositional knowledge vs. Procedural knowledge (Conscious knowledge) vs. Tacit knowledge (Polanyi) Comprehension (knowledge about) vs. Apprehension (knowledge by direct acquaintance) (Kolb) "There are problems with all these constructs, and most knowledge in the real world is a combination of many forms, but the distinctions are far from sterile." Just because someone has been in the communications field for twenty years, does not make them an expert. Remember, we are striving to be "counselors" not pigeon-holed as "practitioners." What is the right thing to do...be it ethical or tactical? This is our drive. Age is no barrier, only the levels of which you expand your mind.
Reader Rachel brought this article to my attention: Interesting Times: Quiet, America is sleeping by Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post. Rachel says: Singer lays out the perfect description of what is going on in this country. His initial assessment is what I have believed since 9-12-01: Bush has failed to to persuade Americans, let alone Europeans, that the West is at war. Can it be that easy, or that hard? He had his chance... now, Israel, (at least its editorial pages) believe what was written in the WaPo by Anne Applebaum that the West has entered a " post-post-9-11 era " If this is true, we have much work to do. Not only in our own sphere of influence, but throughout this nation. Singer asks: Why the apathy? Why the silence? Why the resignation? ... this one sentence makes me angry... Yet, is it true? Are we resigned? He concludes that we are psychologically not able to conceive of winning this war..blah blah blah..I disagree..the real reason, we were told to 'go about our business as usual'..to tell Americans to go shopping and not prepare for war was the biggest mistake Bush made... now we pay the price.. Hush, America is sleeping? --Rachel
online doctorate programs inger says: It is not so much that Westerners do not feel threatened, it is that they don't see how they can win." Psychologically, it is natural to respond to a threat you think you can't do anything about by trying to ignore it. ...
I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists
how to register a business name in id announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.
I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming
cell phone ringers nd increased levels of carbon dioxide.
I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years according to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth
california shared office as gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.
I had to laugh out loud when I read the article in last week’s paper warning us about the coming catastrophe of climate change and how it will affect our children and grandchildren. I cannot address the whole article but I can rebut a few assertions stated as fact in the article. First of all, climate scientists did announce last week that 2006 was the warmest year on record. What the article fails to mention is that these records have been kept for about 116 years. Hmmmm, how long have we been around? Maybe 6000 or 7000 years
river rafting trip ccording to modern history? How long has the earth been around? Most scientists agree that the earth is about 4 billion or so years old. What was the temperature of the whole earth 5000 years ago. a million years ago, a billion years ago? We really don’t know, do we? We do know that the earth has gone through many phases of warming and cooling during its existence and this was long before we appeared on the planet. To suggest that we have anything to do with global warming or cooling is pure sophistry considering that a single major volcanic eruption spews exponentially more carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere than all the pollutants released in the history of man. The article also purports that there is a clear relation between global warming and increased levels of carbon dioxide.